Oh! I was wrong, very upset, sorry... ;( On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:26 AM, tyru <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Now that we have some functions with a common prefix, it seems to work >> quite well. The older way of having read_xxx(), write_xxx(), >> check_xxx() makes functions scatter. xxx_read(), xxx_write() and >> xxx_check() looks better, easier to find what you are looking for. >> >> Anything against it? > > Hmm, to make sure, let me confirm that: > Are you changing older functions which do not have a common prefix?
s/older/old/ > > json*() and js*() functions are new, > but, for example, readfile() is not new. > There are many many plugins to use them. > We should change them now. s/should/should NOT/ -- Takuya Fujiwara -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
