Hi Bram and list, 2016-2-12(Fri) 1:08:46 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar: > Hirohito Higashi wrote: > > > Hi Bram and list, > > > > I think The following built-in functions names visibility not good. > > jsonencode() > > jsondecode() > > jsencode() > > jsdecode() > > > > I suggest that we rename these function names to: > > json_encode() > > json_decode() > > js_encode() > > js_decode() > > > > Somehow, I wrote a patch. > > > > I think possible in time. :-) > > How about this? > > Now that we have some functions with a common prefix, it seems to work > quite well. The older way of having read_xxx(), write_xxx(), > check_xxx() makes functions scatter. xxx_read(), xxx_write() and > xxx_check() looks better, easier to find what you are looking for. > > Anything against it?
No. I have a confirmation. Only above four functions to rename. Aren't you? -- Best regards, Hirohito Higashi (a.k.a. h_east) -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
