Hi Christian, On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Christian Brabandt <cbli...@256bit.org> wrote: > On Do, 28 Jul 2016, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > >> I think it should. Most users will have 'wrapscan' on, since it is the >> default. If someone switches it off he must have a reason for it. > > okay, fixed with the latest version >
I tested the latest patch and the confirmed that the problems I reported earlier are fixed. I saw some new issues. Take the following text: 1 2 these 3 the 4 their 5 there 6 their 7 the 8 them 9 these The cursor is in line 1 and I have 'nowrapscan' set. I search for "the" and press CTRL-N 7 times and "the" in "these" is highlighted. Now I press CTRL-L to copy "s" and then erase it. Now if I press CTRL-P, I expect that the cursor will move to line 8. Instead the cursor moves to line 7. Another problem: Place the cursor in line 1. Enter "/thes" and then press CTRL-N. The "thes" in line 9 is highlighted. Now if you press backspace, the cursor jumps back to line 3. I expected that the cursor will remain in line 9. I think, the CTRL-N and CTRL-P should respect the search direction. For example, if I search a pattern using "?text", pressing CTRL-N should search backwards. Currently CTRL-N always searches forward (irrespective of the search direction). Note that this is different from how "n" and "N" work. A typo: The help text in cmdline.txt for CTRL-P refers to CTRL-N. the current match is displayed then CTRL-N will move to the previous match - Yegappan -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
