On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:14 PM, kosta...@gmail.com <kosta...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If someone could provide a small (but useful) Tex program and indicate >> which tags should be identified, and the rules by which to identify >> it, I could consider how much work it would be to add it. > TeX is not a programming language. > You can consider about it like HTML (but it is very brutally > comparison). > Here you can find an example LaTeX file: > http://sip.clarku.edu/tutorials/TeX/intro.html > >> If I recall on this list, there is other talk about ReTex (or something). >> Is there different dialects of Tex? > TeX is a generic language. > There are some extensions of it. > The most popular (and common) is LaTeX. > Furthermore bibtex and tetex. > > It will be excellent if Exuberant Tags will parse at least following > tags: > subsubsection > subsection > section > chapter
If you can build ctags from source I have checked in a tex parser. Looks for files with .tex extension. Produces 5 types of tags: c,chapter s,section u,subsection b,subsubsection p,package It is a token parser which can handle tags of this format: \keyword{any number of words} \keyword[short desc]{any number of words} \keyword*[short desc]{any number of words} \keyword[short desc]*{any number of words} Will find tags for the following lines: \usepackage{amsmath} \chapter{chapter text} \section{section1 text} \subsection{subsection2} \subsubsection{subsubsection3 with extra text} If someone that actually uses Tex can give it a go you can email me directly with any issues. Dave --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---