this not a spam. yes, I replied to the wrong mail, sorry.
thanks, Jürgen

2009/5/6 Jürgen Krämer <[email protected]>:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
>>
>> On Wed 6 May 2009 16:19 +0200, bill lam <[email protected]> dixit:
>>> On Wed, 06 May 2009, redspider red wrote:
>> [Chinese text]
>>> (I tried to translate what he/she wrote)
>>>
>>> It was a little busy in office today. (I) only wrote 2 pages. see
>>> attachment.  You have a look at it to see if there are any problems.
>>> There are some uncertain places that I marked inside the PDF in the
>>> attachment.
>>
>> OK, so it's definitely spam. I don't know how it got through...
>
> I don't think so. I guess "redspider red" just replied to the wrong
> mail or chose the wrong address from his address book.
>
> Regards,
> Jürgen
>
>
> --
> Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere
> in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.     (Calvin)
>
> >
>



-

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to