Linda W 写道: > It didn't occur to me that such a policy would follow the vim > list when it became hosted on web-enabled group host'er like > google-groups. > > I'm not sure how the text you include below is insulting. It > was meant in truth. If you are unable to read my HTML posting, > rendered in HTML, I felt you would be deprived, as it was well formatted > and I spent a large block of time over 3 days composing it. > > I DID, despite the comments of those ignorant of email structure, > post it in plaintext as well as in HTML. >
Please google for RFC official website, download them, read them, you'll know all RFCs are well structured, and all RFCs *are* plain text. stating that text structures cannot be properly represented in plain text is simply an ignorance. HTML post is generally rude in hacker culture / internet culture, because you *force* users to use *your* font name and your font size and your foreground/background to view the text. while in most case this kind of *force* is unnecessary. It would be much helpful if you post your RFC in real RFC format, yes, they are well structured plain-text. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
