Hi! 

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> programmer and for banging out posts within mutt. I've heard of people
> preferring urxvt, but never figured out why.

For a long time, urxvt's unicode support was multiple orders of
magnitude better than xterm's (as in: xterm didn't have any). If
you use more than the 26 Latin chars used in ASCII English in your
everyday language, proper first-order support is important. Since
you're an old fart like me: Unicode support was/is the modern
equivalent of being 8-bit clean.

Also, urxvt can be compiled to be very, very small, which some
people prefer for whatever reason. 

Regards,
Tobias

-- 
Sent from aboard the Culture ship
        GCU Only Slightly Bent

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to