On 07/19/13 03:34, shawn wilson wrote:
On Jul 18, 2013 5:54 PM, "Ben Fritz" <fritzophre...@gmail.com
<mailto:fritzophre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 18, 2013 3:51:01 PM UTC-5, Lech Lorens wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 18, 2013 3:42:06 PM UTC+2, shawn wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm constantly looking for the first octet of IP addresses, so I do:
> > > /[^0-9\.]10\.
> > >
> >
> > Slightly off-topic, but wanted to make you aware that [^\.] matches
anything that isn't a dot AND IS NOT A BACKSLASH. IOW backslash is not
escaping the dot inside the [] range.
> >
>
> And furthermore the . doesn't NEED escaping inside the [] range.
>
This is probably a feature request but I really do hate the regex engine
and would love to swap it out. Is there / can there be a compile time
option to use a different engine?
There is a runtime option to disable the new engine in favour of the old
one — or vice-versa. See :help 'regexpengine'
--
The only difference in the game of love over the last few thousand years
is that they've changed trumps from clubs to diamonds.
-- The Indianapolis Star
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
