> Well, that may have been true earlier, but the newer versions of PC-DOS were > (IMHO) far superior to Microsoft's offerings, especially since MS-DOS 7 was > never a full product (Version of DOS Win95 is run on top of, missing most > utilities included in MS-DOS 6.22)
I know this is getting way OT, but wasn't Digital Research's DR-DOS the best DOS of it's type. IIRC it was the first with memory optimisation, protected mode and the only DOS to reallyy exploit the extra features of the 286 processor. I also once read that bugs in said 286 processor prevented DR-DOS from running properly and hurt it chances... Cheers, Adam -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 | Free iBook! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml> The FAQ: <http://macfaq.org/> Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
