On 02/29/2012 12:22 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
There are certainly other alternatives. Thoughts?

I would prefer that remote participation be required but I really
don't know what the cost difference would be, and I think that
matters.

I'm not enthusiastic about interim meetings, but that's more
because I think they represent a process failure/ineptitude (you
*really* can't make progress without one?) than anything to do with
problems associated with remote participation.

Melinda

--
Melinda Shore
melinda.sh...@gmail.com
Software longa, hardware brevis
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet

Reply via email to