On 02/29/2012 12:22 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
There are certainly other alternatives. Thoughts?
I would prefer that remote participation be required but I really don't know what the cost difference would be, and I think that matters. I'm not enthusiastic about interim meetings, but that's more because I think they represent a process failure/ineptitude (you *really* can't make progress without one?) than anything to do with problems associated with remote participation. Melinda -- Melinda Shore melinda.sh...@gmail.com Software longa, hardware brevis _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet