On Mar 30, 2012, at 11:31 PM, Martin J. Dürst wrote: > On 2012/03/30 22:15, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Dave Cridland<d...@cridland.net> wrote: >>> On Fri Mar 30 14:01:52 2012, Yoav Nir wrote: > >> I have carried my laptop up to the mike when channeling people >> precisely so that there could be some >> amount of interaction when their question was asked. This is pretty >> cumbersome and could certainly be improved by technology. > > From a usually remote participant: Thanks, great idea. > > As a general suggestion: Let the "channeler" sit just besides the mike, so > this involves minimal effort.
Requires a room with more than one working mic. Sometimes that's all we get. Stupid related question: 98% of the people in the room have two or more devices with a mic in their possession during the meeting. Why do we queue at mics and needs special mics for scribes when we've got all this idle hardware laying about the room? A simple SIP conference bridge with UAs sporting "push to talk" and time-delay features (echo avoidance) might make life much easier. -- Dean _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
