At 12:19 PM 2/22/00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Jordan Henderson wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks.  I guess I thought that a lot of these patches you
> > mentioned would have been folded into .660.  I'll investigate
> > each and see if they are and I'll search the archives for others.
>
>If a patch appears on vmsperl it may be a "what do you folks think
>of this?" sort of thing.  It needs to go to perl5-porters to be "official"
>and then there is no guarentee that it will be accepted.

On the other hand, Sarathy's pretty cool about VMS-specific things, so 
they're rarely not added.

> > I hope to have a new OpenVMS advocacy web site up soon.  Maybe
> > I'll post such collated information there.
>
>Cool.  BTW by home ISP account @ best.com is such that I cannot even unpack
>a perl tar ball in my $HOME directory thre due to disk quota limitations.
>Hence there is a very hard limit to what I can put there.  If you (and Dan
>too) want to snag a copy of Pod2VMShlp from:
>
>   http://www.best.com/~pvhp/vms/Pod2VMSHlp-1.01.tar.gz
>
>I'd appreciate it.  One of these months I'm going to remember my CPAN
>upload password (maybe).

Done. sitting in ftp.sidhe.org.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

Reply via email to