This is a big problem for Windows remote control tools due to the way that screen buffering is done; definitely much slower.
What I personally tend to do if I'm going to work in a console window, though, is use a telnet server on the remote system. I know it's not as nice as having it integrated, but I've yet to see a GUI client that can handle character windows rapidly. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henry Prins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, 2002-06-10 14:12 Subject: (no subject) > I currently use "pcAnywhere" to support my clients and have found that they > do not support full screen dos. I've been looking around for alternate > solutions and have found your program to be very efficent execpt that it > also does not support full screen dos. > > Due to the fact that full screen dos moves much faster then a window dos box > is there any thought being put into full screen dos support? There is > approxamately a 65-80% slow down when running some applications in a window > mode compared to full screen dos mode. > > simply do a directory on two identical computers next to each other one with > full screen and one in a window and you'll see. > > Just some food for thought from someone who does a lot of dos work. > _______________________________________________ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
