Hey Jeff,
Spent some time thinking about the two posts you wrote...Unfortunately I'm
not much help on the coding side of things.
But in terms of functions and use...here's a couple of suggestions.
1) The default state of an Avatar is as a Wizard ( providing it's stable )
and the VNet world ought to determine what range of functionality is
allowed. Again the default is everything goes.
2) An Odd Function: Be able to load new HTML frames in the browsers of
VNet clients ( say your viewing VNet is in one frame - the other is blank.
And I could control your blank frame via VNet ) - Is this possible? In the
long term I'm not sure if this is needed - but here and now it'd be a cool
function.
3) Have it done as planned by Oct 4 so we can show it off at Georgia Tech
;^) ( Actually these issues are large part what I wish to dicuss there )
Will look again at your prior posts for more ideas.
Steve
>hello
>
>in an effort to better understand "the Big Picture"
>in an effort to be able to conceptualize the current release state of VNet
>I have run the source code through JVision (a UML tool)
>and posted the resulting diagram and JavaDocs at:
>
> http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/UML/VNet1.1b1/
>
>the next step after "grokking" it a bit better
>is to construct a diagram
>of what the next VNet version might look like
>
>comments are welcome as always
>
>jeffs
>
>--
>Jeff Sonstein
>Assistant Professor
>Department of Information Technology
>Rochester Institute of Technology
>----------------------------------------
> http://ariadne.iz.net/
> http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/
> http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc
>----------------------------------------
>There are no bugs,
>there are just undocumented features
