On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Miriam English wrote:
> Wow, this stuff feels way over my head, but if it mitigates some of the
> java-security problems, allows for load-balancing, and makes for more
> scalability and flexibility then I say, yummy! bring on the aglets! :-)
and I said earlier:
> > > the problem I have with peer-to-peer in a VNet context
> > > is that the VRML viewers are all plugins
> > > which means that [coupled with the VNet client being an Applet]
> > > there is a security model problem
> > > if the VNet client HTML page were loaded from local disk-store
> > > this might be something we can beat
and Mike wrote earlier:
> >I, and others, have been working on mobile Java applications, using Aglets
[snip]
so I find myself wondering
how the list would respond to the idea of
a free-standing Java application
providing VNet service connectivity
or
an applet one must download and install locally
to make a VNet client connection??
oh
and hello from JavaOne
;^}
jeffs
--
Jeff Sonstein http://ariadne.iz.net/
http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc
===========================================
There are no bugs
there are just undocumented features
