By way of additional information, there's a good description of the neon 
chopper circuit in the 419A manual which I include verbatim below (T2 in the 
419A = T1 in the 3420B):

 4-43.   Assume that DS1 lights when the input is applied to T2.  Capacitor C1 
charges until the oscillator switches the input, and DS1 goes off.   When the 
oscillator switches again, the charge on C1 insures that DS2 fires, and DS1 
stays off.   This cycle continues with DS1 and DS2 firing as long as there is 
output from the oscillator.  CR1 and CR2 prevent the capacitor from discharging 
through R1 and R2

This is quite different from the Fluke chopper circuits which do have the 
diodes wired for anti-phase operation (i.e. facing in opposite directions).

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: volt-nuts [mailto:volt-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of David C. 
Partridge
Sent: 14 November 2017 09:37
To: 'Discussion of precise voltage measurement'
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] 3420B chopper drive problem

In off-line discussion with Dr. Frank, it turns out that his proposal that the 
diodes should face in opposite directions was incorrect.

The below is therefore wrong.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: volt-nuts [mailto:volt-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of David C. 
Partridge
Sent: 08 November 2017 14:08
To: 'Discussion of precise voltage measurement'
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] 3420B chopper drive problem

Interestingly the PCB is marked to suggest the schematic is correct!  And while 
the connections to the neons have been reworked, it would appear the diodes 
never have.

Reversing one diode gave me a +ve going square wave at TP1 from 0V.

Restoring that diode and reversing the other gave me a -ve going square wave 
again.

That didn't makes sense, so I checked the wiring, from the edge connector on 
the chopper amp board to the neon PCB.  Turns out it was wired quite unlike the 
schematic, and someone had reworked/moved the wire to board connections at both 
ends.  I disconnected everything, and reconnected as per schematic.   With 
diodes in the original position it was still wrong. 

When I then reversed CR2, I got a nice square wave that was asymmetric about 0V 
and I could adjust to +150mV/-75mV.

I think that this is the correct waveform for a 3420B, and that all the 
waveform diagrams in the manual for TP1 on the A2 board are correct for the 
3420A, but totally wrong for the 3420B!!!

The specific figures in error are: Figure 5-8 (page 5-8), Figure 5-18 (page 
5-18).  Figure 5-20 on page 5-19 is correct as it says correctly that it only 
applies to the 3420A!

Cheers
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: volt-nuts [mailto:volt-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Dr. Frank
Sent: 07 November 2017 16:32
To: volt-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [volt-nuts] 3420B chopper drive problem

Hello Dave,

in the schematic, the polarity of the diodes in series with the neon bulbs is 
definitely wrong.

If you compare with the 3420A on page 7-7 (29), but also with the Fluke
845 which is similar, both neons have to be switched at 180°.

Maybe someone else has erroneously reversed one of the diodes in your unit 
before?

If both neons are really firing in phase, instead, that could explain this 
non-symmetric waveform, which you observe.

Frank

_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to