Is C of M true as well? Harry
Keith Nagel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Frank, > > You should be aware that back in the mid 90's, _many_ people > were encouraged by Greg to build and test these devices. I > was not one of them, preferring my own insanity to others, > but some are still on Vo. These devices started with Emil > Hartman as far as I can tell, and they do work as described. > JLN has a good collection of others work on his site, > check there. It's seductive for just that fact, that it > does look like you can just tie the tail to the head > and have a nice oroborus. > > That said, no one to my knowledge was ever able to close > the loop and return the ball to the starting position. > Many ramps were put together in a loop, a looped track > was used, and as I last suggested to Greg before he > was given the boot, simply allowing the ball to run > under the ramp. None of these things should work, by > the C of E ( Church Of England???? No, Conservation > of Energy, damnit! ) But they should be tried all the > same. Not because I doubt in the C of E, but because > few systems are really closed to the environment. > > The funny thing is, it looks like the only person _not_ > to have built a smot was Greg himself. That makes me > chuckle, it really does. > > K. > > > > > >
