Richard Macaulay wrote:
>
> Fred
>
> I went to a skin doctor some years ago. He said " stay out of he sun".
> I suggested the problem was the small desktop fluorescent lamp.
> Since that time I have considered the " artificial" light as a source of OU.
> During my recent visit to that doctor he said "I have been thinking about
> fluorescent light > and you may be correct that natural sunlight plays a
> lesser role than lamp but we lack a better method of measuring the role such lamps play > in skin cancer.
>
>
> > Neutral Molecule velocity v = (kT/0.5*m)^1/2 (T could be very high for a neutralized ion)
>> Is something like this going on in the MAHG and with Mills' Hydrino catalyst/s? The fluorescent lamp has a 253.7 nm and 184.9 nm mercury UV
and lower energy UV that isn't suppoesed to get through the phosphor, glass,
and air at close range.
OTOH, if the Mills Hydrino-Type "Fractional Orbit" in the argon/mercury or
phosphor/glass is being formed, there could be some KeV (soft X-Rays
coming out.
>
> We need a believable method of measuring it. Perhaps a type of bio-genetic
> instrument may serve the purpose.
>
A concentic tube calorimeter around a standard bulb would be a start.
Frederick
>
> Richard
>
|
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Frederick Sparber
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Mark Jordan
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Frederick Sparber
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Jones Beene
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Jones Beene
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Frederick Sparber
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Frederick Sparber
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Jones Beene
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Jones Beene
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Terry Blanton
- Re: Are Fluorescent light Bulbs OU ? Frederick Sparber