$10/bbl is the Saudi’s lifting (production) cost for getting it out of the 
ground, which, next to C./S. America, is the lowest cost found on the planet.  
But the exploration costs are usually more

http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=367 
<http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=367&t=6> &t=6

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/crude-oil-cost-of-production-2014-5

 

For explanation of terms:

http://www.eia.gov/finance/performanceprofiles/oil_gas.cfm

 

-mark

 

From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 1:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT : $55 oil freaking out stock market

 

Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]> wrote:

 

$55 oil freaking out stock market, So is it really Saudi controlled to bankrupt 
shale investors or is there some possible relationship to LENR?

 

I do not think that cold fusion has played any role in this. It is caused by 
fracking in the United States which has lowered the cost and increased supplies 
of both oil and natural gas.

 

The moment it becomes generally known that cold fusion is real and that it is 
likely to be commercialized, the price of oil will fall to $10 a barrel. That 
is approximately what it costs in Saudi Arabia, I believe. It will never rise 
again.

 

Eventually oil will fall to zero dollars per barrel, and then negative $10 per 
barrel, when it is synthesized from garbage. That is to say, people will pay 
you to take their garbage and others will pay you a little for the oil, which 
will still be needed for plastic feedstock, lubrication and a few other 
purposes.

 

I hope that eventually people will synthesize teratons of oil from CO2, and 
pump it back underground, where it belongs. This will reduce the carbon 
concentration in the atmosphere and prevent global warming. We could pump it 
underground or ship it off-Earth via a space elevator. If people on Mars have 
no use for it we can dump it into the sun I suppose. That is what we should do 
with all of the fission rad-waste left from today's nuclear reactors. The 
notion that we have to bury that stuff underground here on earth and protect it 
for the next 10,000 years strikes me as unimaginative. It is silly. This is a 
problem we should leave to our great-grandchildren to fix. They will be able to 
do it more easily than we can. It will be a minor expense for them. Some 
problems are best left for posterity to fix.

 

- Jed

 

Reply via email to