---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Randy Mills rmi...@blacklightpower.com [SocietyforClassicalPhysics] <
societyforclassicalphys...@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: [SocietyforClassicalPhysics] "a mixture of nickel and lithium
aluminum hydride"
To: "societyforclassicalphys...@yahoogroups.com" <
societyforclassicalphys...@yahoogroups.com>

...I think that it is a mistake to use a hydrogen porous vessel for a
hydrino reaction.

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 4:48 AM, <pjvannoor...@caiway.nl> wrote:

>   Probably at that temperature the hydrogen will leak very fast through
> the cell even if it is sealed properly
>
> Peter v Noorden
>
>  *From:* Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 31, 2014 5:36 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
>
>  Based on analysis of Lugano and Parkhomov work, excess heat begins at
> about 950C.  The MFMP dogbone core was measured to be over 1200C and no
> excess heat was found.  The likely suspect is that the glue used to seal
> the reactor tube failed, allowing a leak of the H2 when the LiAlH4
> decomposed.  The experiment was shut down because going higher in
> temperature risked burnout of the dogbone heater coil and the excess heat
> should already have been seen at a lower temperature than the 1200C core
> temperature that was achieved.
>
> Ryan Hunt is going to try again.  We will try to contact Parkhomov to ask
> what cement he used to seal his reactor. We are also looking at ways to
> test the seals that we make.
>
> Bob Higgins
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Wow,  Replication fails.   They had the "dog bone" so hot the steel
>>> stand holding it was white hot.  But power in was equal to power out.   No
>>> radiation.
>>>
>>
>
>>   I have a hunch that was too hot. As the proverbial shaggy dog was too
>> shaggy, since we are using dog-related images here.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to