It is my contention that the Ni/H reactor is a proof of principle for the
quantum computer. In the Ni/H reactor energy is shared instantaneously
between all the plasmonic components of the reactor because there exists a
condition of global BEC maintained throughout the reactor.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> The mechanism that underpins the quantum computer is entanglement and the
> speed of entanglement is instantaneous. Computing components will be
> connected through long rang entanglement so data will be shared
> instantaniously.
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:15 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> All boolean functions (meaning all programs) can be parallelized to only
>> 2 gate delays.  The problem is your computer ends up with more gates than
>> there are elementary particles in the universe.
>>
>> A good deal of real computation consists of, in essence, decompressing a
>> compressed form of the the answer.  The difficulty of writing MPP software
>> is essentially attempting to decompress the compressed form of the answer
>> (ie: the program and its inputs) prior to run time so it maps on to your
>> parallel architecture.
>>
>> To make software maintainable, you start out with the minimal description
>> -- the Ockham's Razor version -- so that you don't introduce extraneous
>> complexity to the program specification.  The rest, as they say, is
>> expansion of the Kolmogorov Complexity and there is just no getting around
>> the fact that you have a _lot_ of serial work in that process.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Architectures that attempt to hide this problem with lots of processors
>>>> accessing local stores in parallel are drunks looking for their keys under
>>>> the lamp post.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I disagree. The purpose of a computer is solve problems. To process
>>> data. Not to crunch numbers as quickly as possible. The human brain is many
>>> orders of magnitude slower than any computer, and yet we can recognize
>>> faces faster than just about any computer, because the brain is a massively
>>> parallel processor (MPP). Many neurons compare the image to stored images
>>> simultaneously, and the neurons that find the closest match "come to mind."
>>> Many data processing functions can be performed in parallel. Sorting and
>>> searching arrays has been done in parallel since the 1950s. Polyphase sort
>>> methods with multiple processors and mag tape decks were wonderfully fast.
>>>
>>> It is difficult to write MPP software, but once we master the techniques
>>> the job will be done, and it will be much easier to update. Already,
>>> Microsoft Windows works better on multi-processor computers than single
>>> processor models. Multiprocessor also run voice input programs much faster
>>> than single processors.
>>>
>>> A generation from now we may have personal computers with millions of
>>> processors. Even if every processor were much slower than today's
>>> processors, the overall speed for many classes of problems will be similar
>>> to today's supercomputers -- which can solve problems hundreds of thousands
>>> to millions of times faster than a PC or Mac. They will have the power of
>>> today's Watson computer, which is to say, they will be able to play
>>> Jeopardy or diagnose disease far better than any person. I expect they will
>>> also recognize faces and do voice input better than any person.
>>>
>>> There may be a few esoteric problems that are inherently serial in
>>> nature and that can only be solved by a single processor, but I expect most
>>> real world can be broken down into procedures run in parallel. Of course
>>> the breaking down will be done automatically. It is already.
>>>
>>> Before computers were invented, all large real world problems were
>>> broken down and solved in parallel by large groups of people, usually
>>> organized in a hierarchy. I mean, for example, the design of large
>>> buildings or the management of corporations, nations or armies.
>>>
>>> The fastest data processing in the known universe, by a wide margin, is
>>> biological cell reproduction. The entire genome is copied by every cell
>>> that splits. This is a parallel process. The moment a strand of DNA is
>>> exposed to solution, all of new bases begin match up simultaneously. DNA is
>>> also by far the most compact form of data storage in the known universe,
>>> and I predict is the most compact that will ever be found. I do not think
>>> subatomic data storage will ever be possible. All the human data now
>>> existing can be stored in about 7 ml of DNA.
>>>
>>> - Jed
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to