Is it similar to: http://www.gizmag.com/cannae-reactionless-drive-space-propulsion/33210/
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:59 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > It looks like a violation of Newton's law unless some of the field > escapes the enclosure carrying momentum in the opposite direction of the > force. I hope it can work, but have my doubts without some exhaust. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson <orionwo...@charter.net> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Mon, Mar 23, 2015 6:08 pm > Subject: RE: [Vo]:prototype for "only" $99,000 > > From Frank > > http://displacementfieldtechnologies.com/products > > Fascinating. They make it clear that the device is still a prototype. Hope > they can pull it off. Thrust being 100-500 mN, I'm guessing that's the > approximate weight (thrust) of a piece of paper as measured at the surface > of Earth. Sounds similar to NASA's ion thrusters already in use on a couple > of satellites. Very efficient. > > Why is it that Americans always round down the prices of their products > with "9" nines, as if they think the dollar amount will look cheaper to the > prospective buyer than if they used a bunch of zeros. I've heard many parts > of Europe don't practice such silly accounting tricks. > > I'm curious. Does this technology violate Newton's Third Law? > - For every action there must be an opposite reaction. - > > Regards, > Steven Vincent Johnson > svjart.orionworks.com > zazzle.com/orionworks > -- Patrick www.tRacePerfect.com The daily puzzle everyone can finish but not everyone can perfect! The quickest puzzle ever!
