oh too bad. but at least it is sure to work ? but on earth what is the interest ?
2015-03-24 9:09 GMT+01:00 Teslaalset <robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com>: > This is based on simple air ionization. Many hobbyists copy this, have a > look at youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01F8V5IhB5k > No violation of any physics laws. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> this is probably in line with the EmDrive family of devices, including >> Cannae Drive , which works too. >> >> for those interested I keep an eye on that >> http://www.scoop.it/t/emdrive >> (pile of more or less interesting articles) >> >> best sources are >> - emdrive.com site >> - nextbigfuture >> - wired >> >> http://emdrive.com/faq.html >> >> http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/02/more-emdrive-experiment-information.html >> >> >> http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-08/07/10-qs-about-nasa-impossible-drive >> >> >> note that some theorist work on anothe theory based on unruh radiation >> >> http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/02/can-emdrive-be-explained-by-quantised.html >> >> http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.fr/2015/02/mihsc-vs-emdrive-data-3d.html >> >> his results seem to paralell Shawyer >> >> the next blackswan to be confirmed... >> >> 2015-03-24 1:17 GMT+01:00 Patrick Ellul <ellulpatr...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Is it similar to: >>> http://www.gizmag.com/cannae-reactionless-drive-space-propulsion/33210/ >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:59 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It looks like a violation of Newton's law unless some of the field >>>> escapes the enclosure carrying momentum in the opposite direction of the >>>> force. I hope it can work, but have my doubts without some exhaust. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson <orionwo...@charter.net> >>>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>>> Sent: Mon, Mar 23, 2015 6:08 pm >>>> Subject: RE: [Vo]:prototype for "only" $99,000 >>>> >>>> From Frank >>>> >>>> http://displacementfieldtechnologies.com/products >>>> >>>> Fascinating. They make it clear that the device is still a prototype. >>>> Hope they can pull it off. Thrust being 100-500 mN, I'm guessing that's the >>>> approximate weight (thrust) of a piece of paper as measured at the surface >>>> of Earth. Sounds similar to NASA's ion thrusters already in use on a couple >>>> of satellites. Very efficient. >>>> >>>> Why is it that Americans always round down the prices of their products >>>> with "9" nines, as if they think the dollar amount will look cheaper to the >>>> prospective buyer than if they used a bunch of zeros. I've heard many parts >>>> of Europe don't practice such silly accounting tricks. >>>> >>>> I'm curious. Does this technology violate Newton's Third Law? >>>> - For every action there must be an opposite reaction. - >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Steven Vincent Johnson >>>> svjart.orionworks.com >>>> zazzle.com/orionworks >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Patrick >>> >>> www.tRacePerfect.com >>> The daily puzzle everyone can finish but not everyone can perfect! >>> The quickest puzzle ever! >>> >> >> >
