The spacing of the nucleons is 1.36 fermi meters.  That's twice their radii. 
This is a constant as the density of the nucleus is constant.   The reciprocal 
of this spacing is the nuclear wave number. The wave number and the elastic 
constant give a sonic velocity of 1,094,000 meters per second in the structure.


That's my constant and I am sticking to it.  It is also the cold fusion 
velocity.
   
   
   
   
Frank Znidarsic   
    
    
    
-----Original Message-----    
 From: Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com>    
 To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>    
 Sent: Fri, Mar 27, 2015 12:27 pm    
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:A picture is worth a thousand words, or maybe 10k    
     
     
      
       
        Jones--       
       
                
       
        The Li-6 loves neutrons and will readily change to Li-7, if one is 
nearby.  It may be that the Li-6 acts as a catalyst to combine the charge of a 
proton and an electron to form a neutron and He-5, which in turn gives up 
another neutron and gets to He-4. The neutrons can then combine with most 
anything to form an isotope up to Ni-62 with loss of mass along the way.  It 
will be interesting to see what the isotopic analysis of Parkhomov's ash is.  
It is being evaluated currently.  We may see some Si-28 coming from Al-27 
transmutation via the short-lived Al-28 isotope.         
       
                
       
        Also, in thinking about the geometrical stability of the Li-7 and the 
lack of the stability of Li-6.  I assume you envision a concentrated point 
charge associated with the protons with respect to the geometry.       
       
                
       
        I for one do not think there is a segregation of charge within the 
nucleus, but that the charge is spread  throughout the nucleus so as to 
eliminate discontinuities at a 0 distance. Thus, variation in charge density 
within a nucleus is nil. However the charge density shape can be modified by 
the approach of other charges or electric or magnetic fields.  That is what 
happens when Li-6 is hit with a gamma which causes it to breakup or activate to 
a higher energy state--an isomer with an unstable charge density configuration. 
       
       
                
       
        Bob       
       
                
       
                    
       
                
       
                
       
        
 ----- Original Message -----        
        
         From:         Jones Beene        
        
         To:         vortex-l@eskimo.com        
        
         Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 8:07 AM        
        
         Subject: [Vo]:A picture is worth a thousand words, or maybe 10k        
        
         
        
        
        Th        e following         is overly simplistic, but also         
surprisingly intuitive         for a particular hypothesis        , so it is 
worth the effort to try to get         down         an                 
explanation         for the Rossi/Parkhomov effect         …         one        
         containing         less than a thousand words        ,         by      
   using a few images        …               
        
        Here is an image of the Li-7 nucleus        . Keep in mind the single   
      tenet         that like        -        charges repel.         In a small 
nucleus,         and ignoring QM for a moment in favor of macro geometrical 
restraints         this means         that nesting                 of nucleons  
       becomes complicated        … since                 in the case of        
 3 protons        ,                 they         must                 be kept 
apart         by neutrons.               
        
               
        
                        http://www.lnhatom.com/Lithium%207.jpg                  
     
        
        To oversimplify the point which will be made         below        :     
    t        he red balls are the 3 protons, and they do not touch each other   
      because the 4 neutrons form a tetrahedron which effectively separates 
them        , and         a tetrahedron         is an especially stable         
geometry        .         Therefor        e,         this         isotope       
  should be         more stable than one         where like charges have        
 the possibility of fleeting         contact. In fact, almost 93% of natural 
lithium is this         particular         isotope: Li7         despite this 
isotope being a drip line anomaly in itself        .                
        
        That                 stable         tetrahedral nesting arrangement     
    at the core of Li7                 is not the case with lithium-6 however   
     ;         and         this nucleus         becomes unstable        , 
particularly         when stressed by incursion of positive charge (such as by 
the approach of a proton).         That is because the         only         
stable geometry         which we can visualize                 for Li6         
is to have a         near-        planar         hexagonal         arrangement 
of alternating neutrons and protons, arranged somewhat like a benzene ring      
  , which is not sp        h        erical         and not stable wrt the 
strong force        :       
        
               
        
                        
https://dlnmh9ip6v2uc.cloudfront.net/assets/0/4/e/8/2/519fa09dce395f8b08000000.png
                       
        
        Therefore        , a planar structure         like the one above, when 
it is located         inside orbiting electrons is itself unstable, and the     
    natural charge-equalizing         tendency is         for the         
hexagonal         plane         to revert to         something more compact, 
like         a sphere. Therefore on         occasion        ,         and as    
     several         papers are now suggesting, the lithium-6         nucleus 
temporarily takes the form of 3 deuterons        , arranged         in the X,Y 
& Z axes         where the neutrons of each deuteron are in contact.         
This is where Efimov         state         comes into play.               
        
        Now the visual image         of greatest impact         is to         
imagine the 3 deuterons expressing the Efimov         “        Halo Effect      
  ,        ”                 which is         state of         oscillating      
   balance and "Russian nesting dolls"         geometry as         predicted by 
Efimov.         This state         sh        ould function         like a pump  
      , among other         possibilities        .          But a pump for 
what?       
        
        For those who suspect that the Dirac sea, as expressed in Don Hotson’s 
many papers, is accessible as a point source, then one suggestion is that the 
Li6  nucleus can act like a pump for         “something” which is in        
trinsic to         the Dirac sea        …         and since epos are ruled out 
by the lack of         observed         radiation, then that something is       
  most likely         “        spin        ”        , or         a subset like  
       angular momentum, or         a quantum of spin        :         a Dirac 
spinor, or something alon        g         those lines.        
        
        Thus the Li6 nucleus would be the         a gateway for spin energy 
coupling         –         especially         at a temperature where the 
3-deuteron geometry is favored.         This temperature seems to be in the 
range of 1400K         in the dogbone.               
        
        This hypothesis suggests that the key to the excess heat in 
dogbone-type devices is lithium-6. The         thermal anomaly         will be 
maximized by         enrichment in the isotope, and should go away with all 
Li7.                
        
        Thus        ,         this hypothesis        , despite being 
complicated in detail -         is easily falsifiable        , unlike mo        
st         of the         other         explanations floating around        , 
which generally fail due to         the         lack of observable high energy 
radiation.                        
        
               
        
               
        
               
       
      
     
    
   
 

Reply via email to