I will reread Leif Holmlid muon paper again with your comments in mind to see if there is any observations that shed light on your posits.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Axil, > > > > I may have missed it, but how do you account for the short lifetime of the > muon and why is that signature not showing up? > > > > The muon is unstable with a lifetime of 2.2 microseconds (2.197×10^−6 sec) > and since they have a mass much larger than an electron, but decay to an > electron and neutrino, the decay is energetic. If lots of them were being > produced, then there should be a primary and secondary radiation signature > – bremsstrahlung - from the thermalization of decay electrons. This > signature is known, and if seen would validate your hypothesis. > > > > *From:* Axil Axil > > > > Posts combined revised and extended as follows: > > > > The appearance of muons in the LENR reaction are explained by SPP theory. > > > > > > Regarding: > http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 > > > > Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter > arrangements > > > > The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the > Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically > described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the > production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory > has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT > blog, and the E-cat World blog over many months. > > > > With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter > reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud > chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons > of the appropriate 6 MeV enemy levels rather than tracks produced by > protons? > > > > With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter > reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud > chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons > of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? > > > > Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions > catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of > deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as > explained in the SPP theory. > > > > "In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the > fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay > processes starting in the D(0). " > > > > As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is > carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and > transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an > anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. > > > > http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html > > > > The positive feedback loop between fusion reactions and production of > magnetic fields and entanglement results is a transfer of that energy > derived from fusion into the production of mesons, muons, pions and other > subatomic particles. One result of this conversion of fusion based nuclear > energy is the production of electrons from the decay of muons. We have > suspected this electron production mechanism as informed from comments > Rossi has made about his observation of electrical power production from > the E-Cat. > > > > The Cat/Mouse interface may be using muons produced by the "Mouse" to > activate the LENR reactions in the Cats when the Cats surround the Mouse to > capture most of the Muon flux. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is > carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and > transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an > anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. > > > > http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > *Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions > catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of > deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as > explained in the SPP theory."In this discussion, it is excluded that the > muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are > formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). "* > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter > reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud > chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons > of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Regarding: > http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 > > > > Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter > arrangements > > > > The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the > Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically > described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the > production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory > has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT > blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. > > > > The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is > the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates > for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains > produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the > chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of > plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their > power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it > produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a > celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. > This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least > two distinct although related mechanisms. > > > > First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the > magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. > This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected > matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum > teleportation. This anapole magnetic beam mechanism can act at a > considerable distance away from the vortex. The magnetic beam is energetic > enough to produce mesons from condensation from the vacuum which the decays > into muons which act to produce muon canalize fusion. > > > > Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through > quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. > This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs > within a spherical zone around the vortex. This duality of causation in > the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable > confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the > fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics > linked to a common origin of the effect.. > > > > These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma > radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive > isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly > random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into > heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote > reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and > instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that > occur instantly and collectively. > > > > Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the > presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental > cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a > ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon > dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the > new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in > nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the > nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano > particles are based on chlorine and noble gases. > > > > LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the days of young Tesla > when electricity has be made powerful enough to generate nano particles > from matter. Since we have brought Egely’s name up, Egely has written a > wonderful series of articles explaining how SPPs have produced LENR for > over a century in many diverse and now long forgotten systems going back to > the times and work by Tesla. They are well worth a read and as follows: > > > > http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf > > http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf > > http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf > > > > > > > > > > >
