I would say that muons take less shielding than alphas of the same kinetic 
energy.  The alphas are heavier, but also have more charge.   Muons would be 
like a heavy electron losing kinetic energy by disrupting charged particles in 
a solid.

Bob Cook

From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 9:06 AM
To: vortex-l 
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.

The flow of Muons from the "Mouse" into the "Cats" in Rossi's Self Sustain mode 
(SSM) configuration looks like an application of a muon chain reaction that you 
speculate about. We will need to watch Rossi to see what type of health 
problems he develops from his time inside the shipping container. 

Someone should tell Rossi about the possiblity of muons comming out of his 
reactor then ask Rossi how he will deal with the muon flux coming out of his 
reactor

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

  From: Axil Axil



  Ø      
http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data


  Ø      The Effects of Lead Shielding on Muon Counts…. If you are near a LENR 
reactor, tt looks like lots of muons will get to and into the body. I wonder if 
muons are harmful? 


  Aside from the possible (likely) harm from muons, the curious and disturbing 
thing about this paper is that the authors:


  1)     expected to see a decreasing rate of muon counts as more lead above 
the detectors was added, 

  2)     They were extremely surprised to see that when going from 15cm to 20cm 
of lead, the count rate of muons actually increased 

  3)     This data point was extremely unexpected. They had expected that the 
rate of decrease of the muon count rates would have slowed, but the last thing 
expected was for the count rates to actually increase.


  That is a lot of lead, first of all. Even then, it never blocked all the 
muons. For the muon count to increase, with thicker lead, this means that some 
kind of chain reaction is happening above a thickness level, but muon keep 
progressing thought the metal.

  As an analogy – (of how LENR could benefit from this) consider the known 
parameters of fission … a chain reaction of neutrons is the driver of fission 
reactors, and thus the concept of a chain reaction of muons is intriguing. Can 
muons be harvested?

  As for using this information in a practical manner, the main problem is that 
tons of lead would be needed for even a small reactor - and in the end – the 
question is whether they can be converted into energy.

Reply via email to