Here is the problem. The muon lifetime is only 2 microseconds, so even 
travelling at C, the free path before complete decay is less than a kilometer. 
Lots of muons are made on the Sun but all decay before getting here.

 

The great majority which are made in the Earth’s ionosphere never get all the 
way down. Yet quite a few survive. Perhaps the initial relativistic speed 
extends the lifetime. 

 

But if you are in Salt Lake City, say, which is elevation of 4,300 feet above 
sea level, you will see a lot more cosmic muons than in Silicon Valley at 100 
feet. This may be one reason why P&F were more successful than replicators at 
MIT, near sea level.

 

What I am getting at is this. SPP could be creating additional muons in the 
glowtube reactor, but even without SPP, a usable amount of muons do get 
through; and if muons are responsible for catalyzing some of the gain – a 
reactor running here should do a lot better in SLC or Denver.

 

That would be one way to confirm the role of muons. Set up an experiment in a 
van and drive up to Donner Pass, for instance – 7000 feet. Results should get 
better and better along the way.

 

From: Bob Cook 

 

Jones--

 

It sounds like the relativistic muons interact with normal matter through 
elastic (or inelastic) scattering and hence resonant absorption per your wiki 
source.  And what you suggest is that there are no relativistic muons produced 
by the Sun or shielded by the Sun’s  atmosphere.   That surprises me, but may 
be the case given lack of high temperature resonance in rocks compared to the 
Sun’s atmosphere.way 

 

It is still not clear why a charged particle—a muon-- does not leave an 
ionization path as it travels through matter like other charged particles.  Do 
you know of any source that addresses this question?

 

Muons must cause damage if they happen to come to rest in a biological cell.  
The DNA would likely receive double strand breaks and cause a mutagenic problem 
in gene cells and potentially initiate a cancer like any other ionizing 
radiation does.  

 

Bob Cook

 

From: Jones Beene <mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 12:44 PM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.

 

From: Bob Cook 

Ø      

Ø      Muons appear in Cosmic rays AFAIK.  They must be relativistic to exist 
as long as it take to travel from the Sun to Earth, given their low energy 
decay rate at non-relativist energies.  Cosmic ray muons would be even more 
relativistic with longer apparent lifetimes. 

 

Muons are actually made in Earth’s atmosphere from Cosmic ray impact with air. 
They aren’t coming from the Sun. 

Wiki sez: About 10,000 muons reach every square meter of the earth's surface a 
minute; these charged particles form as by-products of cosmic rays colliding 
with molecules in the upper atmosphere. Traveling at relativistic speeds, muons 
can penetrate tens of meters into rocks and other matter before attenuating as 
a result of absorption or deflection by other atoms. 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon> [5]

Reply via email to