From: Steve High [mailto:diamondweb...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:41 PM To: Vortex <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium
Yes, I have read the circumstances of his death but that does not answer the basic question of whether his technology worked or not. If it did, somebody out there should have been able to replicate at least part of it. The only evidence I ever heard of was a very old Sci Am article in which a radium coated antenna appeared to generate a stronger reception signal (although together with much random noise). I recall someone named Moreland made claims similar to Brown but few details were published. There is an emotional component about random radioactive decay – as anything contrary is usually brought up by Creationists. A classic paper by Emery (Embry?) is usually quoted as exhaustively showing that absolutely nothing can influence the rate of decay. However, I still wonder about thin film layers and HV – also NMR effects. A physicist at American University claimed an influence of 1 x 10 -5 power on Beta decay but I never heard further about it.
