>From a previous post except in part as follows:
I have referenced papers here to show how the confinement of electrons on the surface of gold nanoparticles together with combination with light: a nanoplasmonic mechanism can change the half-life of U232 from 69 years to 6 microseconds. It also causes thorium to fission. See references: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F1112.6276&ei=nI6UUeG1Fq-N0QGypIAg&usg=AFQjCNFB59F1wkDv-NzeYg5TpnyZV1kpKQ&sig2=fhdWJ_enNKlLA4HboFBTUA&bvm=bv.46471029,d.dmQ On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com> wrote: > > > > > *From:* Steve High [mailto:diamondweb...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:41 PM > *To:* Vortex <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium > > > > Yes, I have read the circumstances of his death but that does not answer > the basic question of whether his technology worked or not. If it did, > somebody out there should have been able to replicate at least part of it. > > > > The only evidence I ever heard of was a very old Sci Am article in which a > radium coated antenna appeared to generate a stronger reception signal > (although together with much random noise). I recall someone named > Moreland made claims similar to Brown but few details were published. > > > > There is an emotional component about random radioactive decay – as > anything contrary is usually brought up by Creationists. A classic paper by > Emery (Embry?) is usually quoted as exhaustively showing that absolutely > nothing can influence the rate of decay. However, I still wonder about > thin film layers and HV – also NMR effects. A physicist at American > University claimed an influence of 1 x 10 -5 power on Beta decay but I > never heard further about it. > > > > >
