http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9E03E0D7103FE033A05753C3A9649D946792D6CF


Cold Fusion of Hydrogen Atoms; A Fourth Method Pulling Together

1956!!

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> There's huge consensus about what works though.   Why not establish that
> as a basis and just say other approaches are open questions?  Why does
> everyone go to such huge effort to say "pyroelectric fusion which works at
> low temperatures isn't cold fusion because it doesn't follow
> pons/fleischman experimental apparatus".
>
> What really annoys me to no end is that the first historical usage of the
> term cold fusion actually referred to muon catalyzed fusion!!  The whole
> term got hijacked by these drama seekers.
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The idea that cold fusion doesn't involve hydrogen infused metal is just
>>> end-of-times for these people.
>>>
>>
>> It's really hard to sort out what is known from what is conjecture.
>> There are some careful experimentalists who have made some very measured
>> statements and drawn some very measured conclusions.  And then there are
>> some popularizers who take those statements and overlay all kinds of
>> additional details that do not have a sure foundation, applying what they
>> believe to be obvious logic, which, when analyzed more closely, is not
>> obvious.
>>
>>    - Does CF involve deuterium?  In some cases it appears to.
>>    - Does CF involve light hydrogen?  There's some evidence that it
>>    might in some cases.
>>    - Does CF involve lithium?  In some cases it might.
>>    - Does CF involve palladium?  Somehow, sometimes.
>>    - Does CF involve nickel?  Maybe, sometimes.
>>    - Is helium-4 correlated with excess heat?  Yes, in a subset of CF
>>    experiments with very specific systems.
>>    - Is helium-4 always correlated with excess heat in CF?  Hard to say.
>>    - Is the amount of excess heat indicative of the 23 MeV resulting
>>    from d+d -> 4He?  There was an experiment by a careful researcher that
>>    suggested that it was in that particular case.
>>    - Is the amount of excess heat always indicative of the 23 MeV
>>    resulting from d+d -> 4He?  Hard to say.
>>
>> People want to go well beyond measured statements of this kind.  Some are
>> willing to manufacture consensus in the process.  It's a little hard to
>> watch from the sidelines as this kind of thing is done.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to