Excuse my relative ignorance of nuclear physics (not my bag, baby), but if a Neutron is ejected by conventional means, it will exit with enough energy to pose a hazard in the ways mentioned previously.
But being that Neutrons are not charged, if they are induced to be ejected with comparatively low energy (slow neutron radiation), could the hazards of radioactive isotopes and neutron radiation be mitigated? Of course if they are ejected with very low energy, I'm not sure how that helps excess energy show up. John On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:33 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > I posted a ref from physorg on Tue 10/6/2015 4:10 PM… > > https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg104970.html > > It involves a new observation about resonance which might tie in with the > Swede’s paper... > > -mark > > > > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 9:47 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation > break-through > > > > FWIW: Before pinning a medal on these guys, I want to present a contrary > opinion. > > > > There is no scoop here. Unless it is BS which is being scooped. > > > > The theory looks a lot like a mashup of W-L cold neutrons and Hagelstein’s > neutron hopping, neither of which have a shread of physical evidence. The > do not show neutron activation which needs to be shown for any such theory > to work. They accept the flawed Lugano report as accurate and apparently do > not have an accurate understanding of nuclear spallation. > > > > In short – this looks like a rather poor effort to me. > > > > *From:* Bob Cook > > > > It looks to me like Mats scooped all the other news outlets. Good work > Mats. > > > > The paper is quite good and understandable. Neutron spallation and slow > neutron transmutation stimulated by a an electric field gradient (maybe > across a surface) at a certain resonance. Lots of parameters that can be > engineered. Seems to fit Rossi’s conditions well. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > *From:* Mats Lewan <m...@matslewan.se> > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:50 AM > > *To:* mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > > *Subject:* [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through > > > > Essentially no new physics but a little-known physical effect describing > matter’s interaction with electromagnetic fields — *ponderomotive Miller > forces* — would explain energy release and isotopic changes in LENR. This > is what Rickard Lundin and Hans Lidgren, two top level Swedish scientists, > claim, describing their theory in a paper called *Nuclear Spallation and > Neutron Capture Induced by Ponderomotive Wave Forcing* (full length paper > here > <http://documents.irf.se/get_document.php?group=Administration&docid=1772>) > that will be presented on Friday, October 16, at the 11th International > Workshop on Anomalies in Hydrogen Loaded Metals > <http://workshop.wonderevents.fr/>, hosted by Airbus in Toulouse, France. > > > > Read more here: > > > > > http://animpossibleinvention.com/2015/10/15/swedish-scientists-claim-lenr-explanation-break-through/ > > Mats > > www.animpossibleinvention.com > > > > > > >
