In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:36:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>And furthermore, this leave open the strong possibility that the thermal
>gain in LENR - in fact 100% of the claimed thermal gain, can be realized
>from chemical energy alone. This conclusion intentionally disregards
>experiments with laser input, or with disintegration of nucleons, or with
>nuclear fusion evidenced by gamma rays. IOW, all of the gain in LENR where
>no gamma is seen as evidence of the reaction, can be solely attributable to
>a known non-nuclear physical phenomenon - which is the dynamical version of
>the Casimir force.
>
>630 eV and 620 eV. hmmm. Coincidence, or no ??

Interesting side note:- multiply 630 eV by the fine structure constant and you
get 4.6 eV, which is in the ballpark for chemical energies.

>
>Dunno for sure. and it is just an observation, for now. but I do suspect: it
>is too close not to consider the implications of a chemical gain nexus,
>which is due to dense hydrogen chemical bonds being manipulate for net gain
>by the Casimir effect.
>
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to