It is an interesting speculation. Nature is a truly immense experiment, particularly when considering the number of atoms present. Immense nuclear trials are constantly happening all around us. If this type of sub-nuclear shuffle were happening with the "less difficulty" that you describe, it seems that the effects of that would be far more evident in what we see around us. Can you say what evidence the natural state should exhibit if such a sub-nuclear shuffle were as "less difficult" as you describe? Are there natural occurrences that can be looked for that could validate such a proposition?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Side note for the aestheticists amongst us: Isn’t it likely that a > hexagonal geometry of pico-snowflakes is a generic form which is reflected > in structures all the way down to dense hydrogen? It’s no coincidence > that iron oxide as catalyst, takes on the classic hexagonal > nanostructure, and this geometry becomes reflected in a most stable form > of dense hydrogen (LiH6 and others)... and then reflected the other way, > in snowflakes or gems and rocks. > > *http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269304006860* > <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269304006860> > > Of further interest is a hint at how LENR could be explained… if, that is > … it is found (via Holmlid) that nucleons are actually less difficult to > disintegrate than they are to fuse (via UDD symmetry-breaking where the > baryon octet resists becoming a nucleon sextet): > > > *http://www.treehugger.com/corporate-responsibility/nobel-prize-in-physics-for-beautiful-symmetry-breaking-discoveries.html* > <http://www.treehugger.com/corporate-responsibility/nobel-prize-in-physics-for-beautiful-symmetry-breaking-discoveries.html> > > We’ve talked about D'Arcy Thompson here before. He was the Scottish > biologist and mathematician remembered for “On Growth and Form” (1917) > possibly the most timeless book of science since “Principia”. Peter > Medawar, Nobel Laureate, calls it “the finest work of literature in all > the annals of science that have been recorded in the English tongue.” > > Even without the full picture (or the necessary proof) there can be a > hidden realization which almost jumps out at you, when enough pieces of > the jigsaw puzzle are fitted together … > >
