Maybe right (Sovjet won), Chris. I still think there was no winner just a loser in WWll like all other wars. However, having said so it is true that the drain from the Soviet front made Hitler's reich collapse, as it did to Napoleon a 100 years before and before that another 100 years earlier (1709) to Karl Xll (Swedish king who thought he could bring Sweden back to former glory.). Conclusion do not try to take Moscow it hurts.
I do agree with your other statement. What I do not understand is how we can allow that to go on without demanding a change. I think it is because deep inside ourself we are afraid of any changes and most of us think that if it is expressed by 'the government' - then it is correct. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com> wrote: > A few corrections: the Soviet Union won WW2. About 75% of German > casualties were from the eastern front – they drained Hitler. Careful > historians know this but it’s not a popular subject. Then Senator Harry > Truman thought ‘we ought to help whoever’s losing’ in the fight between > Stalin and Hitler ( previous to Pearl Harbor). > > > > The biggest problem is not anti-science ( creationism and climate hype). > The huge problem facing us is science misused – as for Big Pharma finding > treatments rather than cures and authorities accepting stagnation because > of moneyed interests. Thus, cold fusion………. > > >
