Observers should overlook the Steorn claim of Faraday cage testing as essentially meaningless… with a history. Steorn was saying the exact same thing about the other Orbo incarnations, going back 8 years. Look it up - it’s still online - same old BS then, as now.
Even if they “got religion” and are honest this time around, consider what they are really saying. The problem with the claimed Faraday testing is that you cannot accurately test any device containing a large capacity battery unless you leave it there for months, knowing for sure that the cage is actually “earthed”. Steorn has in the past used a ground which could actually have functioned as an antenna ! (and probably did) At best, a Faraday cage would eliminate a possible source of battery recharging from RF. But Steorn did not show proper grounding… so we are back to the question of basic honesty. Side note: As moderator Bill B sez: the word "ground" can mean several things, several of which can actually be used to implement fraud – or it can be inadvertent, in the case of neon lights in the pub wiring… Ho, Ho Three more quarks for Muster Mac! 1-4 below are not proper earth grounds since they are easily tampered with. 1) A direct connection to the house or factory power supply via a negative terminal. 2) A “common” or negative connection of uncertain status based on having a third, or ground prong. 3) A connection to the inside of a shielded metal fuse box. 4) A connection to a metal mass which is much larger than the circuit (e.g. car chassis or “chassis ground”) …or 5) A direct electrical connection to a conductor purposely driven into the earth or to a copper water pipe which extends out of the house or factory (or pub) and into earth. Only 5 is a useful as a Faraday cage ground which is difficult to trick.
