I set the Teslafy Wayback (Peabody and Sherman version) lever for five years 
ago and found this...Ferrite Heating Demo 2  Uploaded on Feb 4, 2011 Ferrite 
Heating Demo 2
|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ferrite Heating Demo 2 |
|  |
| View on youtu.be | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

2.8 DCA & 3.6 DCA 3/8ths width ferrite incandescence with corresponding 3 phase 
AC inputs. The top red meters are stator line amperages and the middle grey 
meters the phase amperages. In three phase for a delta delivery, the stator 
lines contain 1.71 or (sq rt 3) times the phase amperages. Yet at 1:41 in the 
videos the sum of the stator lines @ 8.54A EQUALS the sum of the phase 
amperages. Thus for this example using summed amperages of the phases 
themselves; ~70% more current exists as the effect of RESONANT RISE OF 
AMPERAGE. It is these outer delta AC currents that become the source of the DC 
currents across the ferrite by intervening rectifications of the three phase AC 
source currents. Note that the ferrite also has a non-linear resistance, it 
instead looses resistance with the amount of heat generated. At the start of 
video 25VDC enabled 2.8 A or an acting resistance of 8.9 ohms.  At the ending 
of video 20VDC enables 3.6A or 5.5 ohms. The reactance of the  megacable 
spiralled delivery lines are 2.3 mh@ 465 hz or 6.7 ohms,but their actual 
resistance used in calculating the I ^2R delivery line losses in wattage are 
only 0.5 ohms, where 12.5 watts out of a 72 watt incandescent load are added to 
the circuit as power delivery. This 17.3% power diversion would be minimized by 
decreasing the resistance of the ballasting outer delta series resonances. If 
this were done this would increase the X(L)/R  Q factor, further minimizing the 
stator line currents without diminishing the existing phase currents exhibited 
on the load, and at the same time decreasing the power expended ratio wise 
between the load and those delivery lines. If the phase angles between the 
stator line currents and the phase currents are mathematically formulated by 
the law of cosines, we see that each corner has near a 60 degree phase angle; 
producing the DELUSION that the normal 360 degrees of time separation between 
phasings has been decreased to 180 degrees in total.  Thus due to the fact the 
delta delivery has vector subtracted currents as a sum, and that resonant rises 
of amperage are occuring on both arms of the load: THE ARTIFACT OF THAT TYPE OF 
LOAD IS THE APPEARANCE OF A CONTRACTED TIME CIRCLE BY PHASE ANGLE 
CONSIDERATIONS.  Huh, maybe something is there... Nope now I remember which 
circumstances can be accounted for and this is one of them. If a resonant rise 
of amperage occurs on a delta delivery it produces an artifact appearing to be 
time distortion, but that time distortion can be discounted as unauthentic 
since it can be explained by the resonant rise of amperage on that delta 
delivery. This does not mean however that in that scheme of electrical heat 
delivery that the efficiency must have vastly been increased. I once sent Jones 
some conditioned (strontium) ferrite pieces for radioactivity examination, he 
said there was none. Precendent you tube video on this subject was found and 
labeled tonight for further examination. HDNPioneering the Applications of 
Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ 

    On Saturday, February 20, 2016 4:40 PM, Jed Rothwell 
<jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
 

 I wrote: 
Silicon is not a good choice of materials for many cell components such as 
resistors.

CIRCUIT components.
Everything is a cold fusion cell to me . . . To a man who has only a hammer, 
all problems look like a nail.
- Jed


  

Reply via email to