I set the Teslafy Wayback (Peabody and Sherman version) lever for five years ago and found this...Ferrite Heating Demo 2 Uploaded on Feb 4, 2011 Ferrite Heating Demo 2 | | | | | | | | | | | Ferrite Heating Demo 2 | | | | View on youtu.be | Preview by Yahoo | | | | |
2.8 DCA & 3.6 DCA 3/8ths width ferrite incandescence with corresponding 3 phase AC inputs. The top red meters are stator line amperages and the middle grey meters the phase amperages. In three phase for a delta delivery, the stator lines contain 1.71 or (sq rt 3) times the phase amperages. Yet at 1:41 in the videos the sum of the stator lines @ 8.54A EQUALS the sum of the phase amperages. Thus for this example using summed amperages of the phases themselves; ~70% more current exists as the effect of RESONANT RISE OF AMPERAGE. It is these outer delta AC currents that become the source of the DC currents across the ferrite by intervening rectifications of the three phase AC source currents. Note that the ferrite also has a non-linear resistance, it instead looses resistance with the amount of heat generated. At the start of video 25VDC enabled 2.8 A or an acting resistance of 8.9 ohms. At the ending of video 20VDC enables 3.6A or 5.5 ohms. The reactance of the megacable spiralled delivery lines are 2.3 mh@ 465 hz or 6.7 ohms,but their actual resistance used in calculating the I ^2R delivery line losses in wattage are only 0.5 ohms, where 12.5 watts out of a 72 watt incandescent load are added to the circuit as power delivery. This 17.3% power diversion would be minimized by decreasing the resistance of the ballasting outer delta series resonances. If this were done this would increase the X(L)/R Q factor, further minimizing the stator line currents without diminishing the existing phase currents exhibited on the load, and at the same time decreasing the power expended ratio wise between the load and those delivery lines. If the phase angles between the stator line currents and the phase currents are mathematically formulated by the law of cosines, we see that each corner has near a 60 degree phase angle; producing the DELUSION that the normal 360 degrees of time separation between phasings has been decreased to 180 degrees in total. Thus due to the fact the delta delivery has vector subtracted currents as a sum, and that resonant rises of amperage are occuring on both arms of the load: THE ARTIFACT OF THAT TYPE OF LOAD IS THE APPEARANCE OF A CONTRACTED TIME CIRCLE BY PHASE ANGLE CONSIDERATIONS. Huh, maybe something is there... Nope now I remember which circumstances can be accounted for and this is one of them. If a resonant rise of amperage occurs on a delta delivery it produces an artifact appearing to be time distortion, but that time distortion can be discounted as unauthentic since it can be explained by the resonant rise of amperage on that delta delivery. This does not mean however that in that scheme of electrical heat delivery that the efficiency must have vastly been increased. I once sent Jones some conditioned (strontium) ferrite pieces for radioactivity examination, he said there was none. Precendent you tube video on this subject was found and labeled tonight for further examination. HDNPioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ On Saturday, February 20, 2016 4:40 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: I wrote: Silicon is not a good choice of materials for many cell components such as resistors. CIRCUIT components. Everything is a cold fusion cell to me . . . To a man who has only a hammer, all problems look like a nail. - Jed