On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: H LV > > MFMP performed a great service by collecting and tabulating this data.... > What story do you read when you compare the active and null data sets over > time? My reading of the active data set begins with the storage of energy for > the first 19 hrs and ends with the periodic release of energy for the last > 9hrs. 'Excess Heat' is not evident....Based on this reading, is it possible > to explain the amount of energy stored and released using just chemistry? > > Harry, > > MFPF is most definitely providing a valuable role in this research, but as > you imply - they appear to have "jumped the gun" on this announcement. The > end result is that the lack of convincing evidence feeds into the agenda of > the Mary Yugo's of the world - just the opposite of what was intended. > > And the skeptics are right this time - there is nothing at all to get excited > about here... yet. The heat is in the noise level and the radiation has been > known for over a decade. Anyone can make a much better case for LENR by using > Rothwell's Library. > > We respect Greenyer's efforts. We hope that he is correct that there will be > more to come shortly. I think that there will be better evidence coming to > light shortly. It's just too bad that he raised expectations high > prematurely... and then had to scurry around to explain the fizzle. Mary > gloats. > > Jones
My impression is the *range* of the spectrum is new. Harry
