Jack, Okay that would explain it. Were the active and null sides both calibrated empty?
Harry On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Harry, > > I can see where you would think that based on the active side being lower > than null to start and later higher. However, there was already the > differential with the active side reading lower than the null side even > during the calibration. Also, chemistry effects in these types of > experiments are fairly clear when they happen and usually don't last more > than 30 mins (certainly less than 1 hour). I base that on numerous > experiments I have conducted, and the chemistry effects are seen at the > temperatures where you expect them to occur. > > Were I to imagine a scenario where the excess heat was not real in this > case, it would go like the following: at lower temperature, the heating coil > has more space between the windings; at higher temperature, it pulls > together beneath the TC producing a higher temp at that spot. Then it > relaxes when it cools off. Of course that is imaginary, but a plausible > alternative. That is why it would be good to do at least conduction > calorimetry. > > Jack > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:37 AM H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> MFMP performed a great service by collecting and tabulating this data. >> >> >> https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/photos/p.1126094137421284/1126094137421284/?type=3&theater >> >> What story do you read when you compare the active and null data sets over >> time? >> >> My reading of the active data set begins with the storage of energy >> for the first 19 hrs and ends with the periodic release of energy for >> the last 9hrs. 'Excess Heat' is not evident. >> >> Based on this reading, is it possible to explain the amount of energy >> stored and released using just chemistry? >> >> Harry >> >
