On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote:
As I have previously pointed out, Clarke's analysis is flawed in terms of > COP analysis - perhaps as badly as the analysis by the Lugano researchers. > Failure to recognize and account for the transmitted radiation through the > outer envelope is a BIG error. > This is my impression, too. It seems that Tom wants to turn an irremediably inconclusive test into one that shows conclusively a result convenient to his own biases. In order to have that, you'd need a proper calibration, so that you could obtain an accurate temperature reading, among other things. Eric
