So, according to Rossi, IH has everything. All the know-how necessary to build a reactor. I hope this is true and the Chinese use the invention in the most pervasive way!
2016-04-08 23:23 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: > Rossi is pissed because his IP was given to competitors. > > Andrea Rossi > April 7, 2016 at 8:32 PM > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=89#comment-1169773> > > Hank Mills: > They prepared everything, the charges, the body of the reactor EVERYTHING > !!!. > I just teached to them what to do. > They never used anything pre-prepared by Leonardo Corp. > Now, let me talk to you of a very singular coincidence: Brillouin has > always made only electrolytic apparatuses: go to read all their patent > applications made before their agreement with IH, and you will find > confirmation of what I am saying ( I know their patents by heart, because I > have studied them and probably I know them better than themselves : I wrote > about 100 pages of notes about their patents ). And now the singular > coincidence: they make the agreement with IH in April 2015, and Voilà, they > made a public demo in Capitol Hill ( Washington, DC) with a device that is > the Copy-Cat of something I am familiar with. Nothing that Brillouin has > ever made before the agreement with IH. What a coincidence !!! > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Nothing to disagree with there. I think there is something fishy going >> on, like the MW reactor supplying heat 24/7, but Rossi is choosing to pick >> the best 8 hours of the day to calculate his reactor's performance. With >> that kind of thinking (and I am just speculating), a set of rechargeable >> batteries could show a COP > 6. So, we need to see the real data and how >> the average was calculated. >> >> To me it seems like deja-vu all over again. Didn't Defkalion claim that >> they didn't pay Rossi because he couldn't make the reactor work reliably? >> I don't think Rossi argued that point, he just dissolved the contract. >> Could that be the problem here too? (Failing to meet the contract terms for >> reactor reliability.) >> >> I also think Rossi only gave IH technical "crumbs" and never gave IH the >> key to making the bread and butter eCat work. >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >>> *From:* Bob Higgins >>> >>> Don't get me wrong, Tom Clarke did good forensic research and wrote a >>> good paper. In Clarke's comment about the translucency, he states: >>> >>> "This error is impossible to quantify because it depends on the heater >>> wire emissivity, temperature, and surface coverage, all of which are >>> unknown." >>> >>> I agree, it is impossible to quantify - sufficient data from the >>> experiment was not reported. >>> >>> Bob, >>> >>> First, here is Clarke’s take on the first Penon report and it isn’t >>> pretty: >>> >>> >>> https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2989-The-August-2012-Penon-Hot-Cat-report/?postID=16547#post16547 >>> >>> As for Lugano, because of the “impossible to quantify” problem - this is >>> clearly not admissible in court. You can see one of many reason why a >>> jury will never hear about a test like Lugano, never hear about >>> imaginary COP of 60 and not hear about the year-long testing either – >>> due to evidentiary rules and the fact that Penon is completely >>> unqualified. >>> >>> Then, we have the problem of anomalous gain, which would violate the >>> “known laws of physics.” I hate that as much as you do, but that is the >>> way the legal system works. Few if any experts can get qualified by a >>> Court who will testify that it can work – much less that it did work. They >>> might have to fly McKubre in from NZ. J >>> >>> In short, Rossi has almost no chance to win a jury trial even if his >>> sordid background and criminal history cannot be introduced, in order >>> to prove a continuing pattern of fraud. A trial is looking like a >>> no-win situation for Rossi, especially up against squeaky clean >>> All-American types who clean up the environment, instead of pollute it. >>> >>> >> > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
