>From the earlier posted copy of the agreement between Rossi and IH (
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.2.pdf),
there is a list of patents included in the licensed IP:

1 - ltalian patent granted for process and apparatus
2- USA patent pendlng for process and apparatus
3- Europe patent pending for process and apparatus
4 - USA patent pending for particulars and theory
5- USA patent pending for control systems
6- USA patent pending for additives and catalyzers in process and apparatus
7 - USA patent pending for HotCat
8-  USA patent pending for direct conversion of photons into electric
energy
10 - USA patent pending for partlculars of the reactor

-- Sean

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Rossi does not need IH anymore and he was looking for a way out from under
>> the IH contract without giving IH that 50 COP package.
>>
>
> If that were the case, Rossi would simply walk away. Let me remind you he
> is suing I.H. for $89 million. He wants payment because he says the
> verification test worked. If all he wanted to do was to get out from under
> the contract he would say: "You say it does not work? Fine. Good. Sayonara."
>
> I.H. has opened the door and offered him a way out. They want him out.
> They do not want to pay the money, so that would end the contract.
>
> What you say makes no sense. I.H. wants out from under the contract; Rossi
> wants them to abide by it.
>
> The only issue is whether the test proves there was heat or not.
> Everything hinges on that. If the test showed no heat, that means there is
> no intellectual property at stake, and nothing for I.H. to steal or sell to
> the Chinese.
>
> If the test is ambiguous the dispute will continue indefinitely. Otherwise
> it must come to an abrupt end one way or the other. All discussion of
> motives and plots and plans is irrelevant. Calorimetry is the only salient
> issue in this lawsuit.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to