And yet the Rossi plant is still producing power with a new fuel load on the customer's site and Rossi is not in the shipping containers nor is any IH personnel.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Jed Rothwell wrote: > > > > Ø What you say makes no sense. I.H. wants out from under the contract; > Rossi wants them to abide by it. The only issue is whether the test > proves there was heat or not. Everything hinges on that. If the test showed > no heat, that means there is no intellectual property at stake… > > > > I agree with that assessment, as far as it goes. In fact, only an idiot > could not agree with it… as far as it goes. > > > > What makes this situation more interesting - to those of us who believe in > LENR as a technology, but think that Rossi is a both a qualified inventor > and a scammer is this: > > What if test shows that in 8000 hours of testing (24/7 he says) there was > indeed 100 hours of COP~50… but this extreme gain only happened in the > period of time when Rossi and his good friends Penon and Fabiani were > present? > > > > This is a likely scenario. It does not matter that IH was paying them at > the time, since both of them are Rossi’s old friends and countrymen, who > have been employed by him for years. Let’s say further than when IH > technical specialists arrive to see this amazing result, the system is back > to COP of 0.90 where it is, most of the time. > > > > Then, the question for the jury is a bit narrower: Is a brief excursion of > excess energy, which cannot be replicated, worth $90 million? … not to > mention that even the existence of this spectacular burst of energy depends > on the words of Rossi’s old friends who are not technically qualified as > experts? > > > > The resolution to this dilemma – and the court may order it – is pretty > simple: to have the system independently tested by a fully qualified ERV – > one with real credentials such as via PhDs from the University of Miami, > which is not far away. I’m not Solomon, but this is what I would do … and > it’s not quite as brutal as splitting the baby in half. > > > > > > >
