Asymmetrical loading of deuterium into metals does indeed produce ‘cold fusion’ as evidenced by prodigious heat and commensurate 4He. It is most certainly NOT loading into cracks it is rather a super loading method for bulk material. Cracks do form but they are a defect not a desired condition.
To understand how this works imagine the deuterium is compressed into an ultra-dense deuterium (UDD) state during bubble collapse. The conditions in a collapsing bubble wall are surely hot enough to ionize hydrogen electrons, density is surely super-metallic perhaps stellar. The UDD from many collapsing bubbles is injected into the target metal lattice in a very short time frame The lattice sees UDD upon entry as if it is ‘super high loading’ and that UDD slowly diffuses outward into surrounding lattice such that loading begins at the highest possible and goes downhill from there. That the target metal is bulk loaded is instantly observable as one can see (video) it swell and expand and to effervesce deuterium much the same as electrochemically loaded Pd does. X-ray diffraction studies by DOD labs have proven that the UDD was in the lattice and likely some remains. The cold sono fusion reactions occur with perfect reproducibility in many different metals. Heat sufficient to cause bulk melting of refractory metals, Pd, Ti, Zr, Nb, Hf, Rh and clear evidence of nuclear processes since at no point is more than a half a watt per cm2 of sono-energy applied to the metals which are immersed in rapidly flowing deuterated liquids. Helium is released into the cooling reactant liquid (and gas traps) and is also found trapped in the metal. While mostly 4He is formed some modalities of the process produce prodigious 3He shifting the 3He:4He ratio by 4-5 orders of magnitude! No significant neutrons are observed nor gamma within the limits of very sensitive neutron and gamma spectrometers. 4He production at rates of e11-e13 ‘alphas’ per second is readily produced. Isotope studies of before and after metals show, in some cases, dramatic shifts of some peculiar isotope ratios tens of percent out of the normal ranges. Under higher pressure systems the required ultrasound controlled cavitation loading can allow for working temperatures at very high temperatures. Even some deuterated liquid metals will perform admirably. The hotter the working temperature the higher the reaction rate. The key engineering problem is that the system becomes so fusion reactive that removing the cold fusion heat becomes problematic, failing to do so results in systems reaching the boiling temperatures of refractory metals aka ~3000 C! NOT controllable! From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 6:12 PM To: John Milstone Subject: Re: [Vo]:COP < 1 should not be negative evidence for cold fusion (thinking in general, not about Rossi) I think sonofusion and cold fusion are the same. The bubble effect on H/D is essentially like cracks, like what Ed says. And even the same case bellow. (Cold fusion and even heat after death, for me, is caused after submitting H/D to pressures of 10^11Pa and submitted to thermal energy than ~0.1eV.) I hope to get my printer to work as soon as possible, since I concentrate more on write something about why this is the case. But, the emission of cold fusion is typically between 10~<E~<10KeV (otherwise, it would be already detected). See these ones: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MileyGHintensenon.pdf http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LipsonAGanomalouse.pdf http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/KarabutABexperimentb.pdf http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MileyGHfuturepowe.pdf It's nearly completely blocked within nanometers of the source, or micrometers, even in air. I think these types of experiments could be a way to start. Maybe a very very tiny CF reactor, similar to what you used, would be a way to detect this type of radiation in abundance. 2016-05-27 20:09 GMT-03:00 Russ George <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >: . My sonofusion reaction was and is easily scalable to generate hundreds of kilowatts steady state output running with duty cycled input of a fraction of 1% of the output. Such sonofusion development to large scale energy production would cost a few million to refine into devices that would cost mere thousands to mass produce.
