Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: This is why I am suggesting other methods to measure cold fusion, like > finding what is the frequency of the photon emission, if this is the case. > Not measuring excess heat by calorimetry is not the same of not having cold > fusion. >
I disagree. I go with Martin Fleischmann's dictum: heat is the principal signature of the reaction. No heat, no cold fusion. I do not trust other metrics, except tritium. I know they are supposedly far more sensitive, but the fact is, when cold fusion heat is definitely present, and the reaction is definitely occurring, these other metrics such as detecting neutrons often show *nothing*. Bupkis. Goose eggs. I don't trust 'em. - Jed
