a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> My point to Jed earlier was why "expert" IH would allow improper > instrumentation (if that were the case) to begin with. It doesn't make > sense. > They did not want to allow this. It was a bone of contention. Rossi wanted one set of instruments and procedures, and I.H. wanted another. They were arguing about it for a long time. (I do not know how long, and I do not know whether the instruments were changed out at some point, but anyway, the dispute began early.) It "doesn't make sense" because what you are describing did not happen. - Jed
