H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: If the instrumentation was so contentious then IH should not have allowed > the year long test to go forward . . . >
Apparently they could not stop it. I do not know why. I know nothing at all about the contract or agreements or why Rossi ended up in charge. > . . . or at least they should have formally told Rossi that they would > not respect the results of the test even if Rossi insisted on performing > the test. > I am sure they did tell him that! They also told to the general public on March 10, before the lawsuit was filed, in this statement: http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=1741 No one in his right mind would respect the results of this test. - Jed
