Jed. As I said before, any knowledgeable person who walked into the
room and looked at the instruments and configuration for a few minutes
would see 5 or 6 ways to disprove the ERV. It was a farce.
AA. So as you claim to know what the instrumentation was, please
describe it.
What was the consultant's name and when was he hired by IH?
On 6/5/2016 3:43 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
As he couldn't disprove the ERV he was desperately looking around
for some way to do that.
That's hilarious! As I said before, any knowledgeable person who
walked into the room and looked at the instruments and configuration
for a few minutes would see 5 or 6 ways to disprove the ERV. It was a
farce. It was as bad as the worst of Rossi's previous tests.
Hence his insistence on visiting the customer's facility.
A person would be insane not to insist on that. Especially after
measuring no excess heat in Rossi's room, and knowing that "customer"
had conducted no business, paid no taxes, had no employees, and had no
equipment inspections. This being the 21st century anyone can confirm
that. Would _you_ write a check for $89 million knowing all that?
Doesn't that make you a little suspicious that the "customer" may not
actually be using 1 MW of process heat?
- Jed
