a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> As he couldn't disprove the ERV he was desperately looking around for some > way to do that. That's hilarious! As I said before, any knowledgeable person who walked into the room and looked at the instruments and configuration for a few minutes would see 5 or 6 ways to disprove the ERV. It was a farce. It was as bad as the worst of Rossi's previous tests. > Hence his insistence on visiting the customer's facility. > A person would be insane not to insist on that. Especially after measuring no excess heat in Rossi's room, and knowing that "customer" had conducted no business, paid no taxes, had no employees, and had no equipment inspections. This being the 21st century anyone can confirm that. Would *you* write a check for $89 million knowing all that? Doesn't that make you a little suspicious that the "customer" may not actually be using 1 MW of process heat? - Jed
