a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: I now read that all the ERV's equipment was connected to his computer and > recorded the readings electronically. It will be interesting to compare the > data logged with what Jed is claiming >
I am not claiming anything about computer data. I do not know anything about such data. As far as I can tell this flowmeter is not electronic, so it could not be connected to anything. Perhaps I have misread the brochure. The only version I can find is an Polish. Anyway, I am sure this was Penon's instrument, because the Exhibit 5 letter is addressed to Penon. So if he had a computer log, I guess the flow rate was not part of it. I do not see any other flowmeters in the schematic but perhaps there was one. > Engineer48, who has direct contacy with Rossi, writes: > "Rossi told me this meter registers zero for backflow. > No one asserts there was backflow. I do not see how there could have been. > The flow is very constant as the big prime and multiple smaller top up > pumps all have multiple 1 way valves and micro computer controlled flow > regulation against varying pressure. > I suggest you take what Rossi says with a grain of salt. He is not a reliable source of information. - Jed
