Hello Mats, I think this is interesting. I understand the critic from Jones and Russ but at least it is a theory and it is based on the result of Lugano. Maybe it was not such a flawed demo just made so it has too many openings for critic. This also enhances the profile of Rossi. He has support from scientists with a lot too lose (prestige) if Rossi is a scam as has been indicated here. I cannot wait for the next report from Rossi and hopefully a up to date experimental report from Lundin / Lidgren. Sounds to me we are slowly progressing towaa realization of lenr, keeping essential business secrets until the last minute before market.)Looks good.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Mats Lewan <m...@matslewan.se> wrote: > The LENR patent application by Lundin and Lidgren referenced in this blog > post: > https://animpossibleinvention.com/2015/10/15/swedish- > scientists-claim-lenr-explanation-break-through/ > > is now public here: > https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=EP&NR= > 3086323A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=&date=20161026&DB=&locale=en_EP > > Mats > www.animpossibleinvention.com > > > >
